DraftKings Working On an “International Road Map” For Expansion

Posted on December 21, 2014 - Last Updated on July 29, 2015

The daily fantasy sports industry has enjoyed lightning growth amidst considerable attention from the U.S. media in the last year.

And now one of the two major players is hoping to export that formula to foreign shores.

That’s per comments DraftKings CEO Jason Robins made to TheStreet.com.

“We have an international road map we’re working on,” Robbins said, asserting that overseas expansion “is one of the most compelling long-term opportunities for us.”

User growth at lower cost?

One reason why Robbins and other DFS sites might look to markets beyond North America: escalating user acquisition costs.

Current conditions in the U.S. market combine to create a perfect recipe for continued upward pressure on the price of bringing in new users to a DFS site. Consider:

  • Both FanDuel and DraftKings have amassed tens of millions in funding, giving them both the ammo to expand the marketing field of play and the justification to continue to pile additional funds into acquisition.
  • The promotional brinkmanship between DraftKings and FanDuel is driving increases in guarantees (and overlay costs) across all sites.
  • A similar arms race for sponsorships from teams and athletes likely brings along substantial (and often immediate) overhead that inflates acquisition costs.
  • The overwhelming concentration of DFS activity and revenue around the relatively brief NFL season results in a hyper-competition that could easily spiral acquisition costs well beyond rational levels.
  • The media hype surrounding DFS is unlikely to persist at its current level for long, and sites will be forced into additional spending to make up for the declining exposure.

Of course, one could easily argue that many of those conditions are not unique to the North American market and are likely to manifest in some similar form in almost any locale.

That conclusion makes it tough to argue for expansion as a cure for the ills of rising acquisition cost.

At that point, the justifications for international expansion start to look more like:

  • A desire to flatten out revenue by further broadening the scope of available sports beyond the NFL.
  • A belief that first-mover advantage will be decisive in what will prove to be valuable markets.
  • A belief that international player pooling (i) is possible; (ii) is critical to the success of DFS and; (iii) that international expansion now will provide a valuable edge when such pooling becomes a reality.
  • An existential need to continue to acquire users in order to maintain the growth story and get across the IPO finish line.

Low-friction, low-overhead markets likely targets

Robbins didn’t explicitly outline a list of target markets for DraftKings’ international expansion, but did suggest that the company would focus on what would appear to be the lowest-hanging fruit.

“[G]oing into the UK is going to be a lot simpler than going into India,” Robbins noted.

DraftKings (and other DFS operators) are likely looking to check a number of boxes before designating a market as a reasonable opportunity, including:

  • Language barriers.
  • Potential regulatory friction: DFS has to date avoided any “special” regulatory treatment in the United States, but international climates may prove more complicated.
  • Potential cultural friction: Fantasy sports has a strong, established place in American culture, but it’s difficult to immediately pinpoint other high-value markets where the activity is as widely or as passionately embraced.

Will the product thrive alongside legal sports betting?

Another concern for DFS sites eyeing international markets is that many of the most obvious options – such as the UK – do not share America’s lack of legal ways to mix money and the outcomes of sporting events.

Some argue that DFS is not a replacement for traditional sports betting, but a new product altogether.

Others counter that DFS is only likely to thrive under the specific set of circumstances present in the U.S.. where sports betting is widely illegal (as are most forms of online gambling), while DFS enjoys a legal carve out on the federal level, is permitted in the vast majority of states, and is afforded a sort of protection thanks to the broader popularity of season-long fantasy sports.

Chris Grove Avatar
Written by
Chris Grove

Chris is the former publisher of LegalSportsReport.com and OnlinePokerReport.com. Grove also serves as a consultant to various stakeholders in the regulated market for online gambling in the United States.

View all posts by Chris Grove
Privacy Policy