- Sports Betting
- NJ Sports Betting
- PA Sports Betting
- Colorado Sports Betting
- US Betting
- LSR Podcast
Pennsylvania is the latest state to get seriously involved in the potential legalization and regulation of the daily fantasy sports industry, with a new piece of legislation introduced on Thursday.
Pennsylvania has largely stayed on the sidelines in the DFS debate over the first half of 2016, as a variety of states considered bills or passed them into law.
But momentum grew quickly in the wake of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board’s report on DFS.
That report was received by the House Gaming Oversight Committee this week, in which Rep. John Payne — the chair of that committee — indicated a DFS bill would see a vote next week.
Of course, the bill had not yet been introduced, but the legislation from Rep. George Dunbar was formally introduced today.
Dunbar originally started looking at DFS more than a year ago, with a bill designed to allow land-based casinos to offer DFS contests.
His new bill — H 2150 — seeks to oversee the entire DFS industry. Interestingly, the bill ignores the PGCB’s recommendation that “the play of fantasy sports in Pennsylvania be provided through the existing slot machine licensees as a gaming related amenity operated through the licensee’s web-site.”
Here’s a look at the that the bill does, in broad terms:
Here is how the state would handle DFS, under the bill:
From Dunbar’s memo seeking co-sponsors and the bill itself, here are some of the consumer protections his bill would put in place:
The arrival of DFS legislation comes at an interesting time for gaming in the commonwealth.
There is an ongoing effort to legalize online poker and gambling, as well, as part of a larger gambling expansion package.
It’s not clear whether the DFS bill will eventually be tied the rest of the gaming issues in the state, or if it will move forward independently. Either course of action seems tenable.
Pennsylvania is also attempting to agree on a budget for the next fiscal year, a process that was highly contentious and delayed for the better part of FY 2015-16.