Is The NFL Getting Serious About Daily Fantasy Sports After Its Latest Move?

Written By Dustin Gouker on March 30, 2015 - Last Updated on February 4, 2022

The NFL is reportedly telling its franchises to sign only short-term deals with daily fantasy sports websites, which could be setting the stage for the future of DFS and the league.

One is enough?

The news came from a short story over at Street & Smith’s Sports Business Daily:

The NFL told teams they could only sign daily fantasy deals for one year, conveying that message at the league’s annual meeting in Arizona. Several teams have begun signing the deals, and the league wanted to formalize the space because it had no policy in the category. …

Teams that have been signing the deals with companies like FanDuel and DraftKings have had to include one-year opt-out provisions in those contracts, sources said.

That development came to light soon after two teams — the St. Louis Rams and the Baltimore Ravens — reportedly agreed to terms on a sponsorship deal with FanDuel. It brought the number of NFL teams that have deals with FanDuel or Draft Kings to a total of six. The others?

Several players have also signed deals with DFS sites in the past year, like New England QB Tom Brady and Seattle Seahawks cornerback Richard Sherman.

So, is the NFL embracing fantasy?

The NFL is clearly high on fantasy sportscommissioner Roger Goodell said as much in an interview at last year. And the first thing you can click on at the NFL’s website is the section labeled “Fantasy.” However, it’s not clear that the league is ready to become a player in daily fantasy sports.

So, with the NFL reportedly mandating one-year deals for teams with individual DFS sites, what could the league be planning or thinking? Here are some possibilities/speculation:

  • The NFL could be simply taking a wait-and-see approach with DFS. The single-year/opt-out mandate might be a way of keeping teams from getting in too deep in terms of a time commitment. While DFS sites will point out that fantasy contests are considered skill games under the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, many still consider DFS games a form of sports betting. The NFL could be in that camp, and simply doesn’t want to attach itself to gambling.
  • The NFL has plans to sign a deal with FanDuel or DraftKings. Minimizing deals to one year would allow for a seamless transition to a single brand-wide sponsor for the 2016 season. This would follow in the footsteps of two other major North American sports leagues (FanDuel for the NBA, and DraftKings for the NHL) that have deals in play. Of course, those leagues allow their teams to sign individual deals with DFS sites. But it’s not hard to imagine that the NFL would want to work with one site only.

Last into the pool?

The NFL is one of the few major dominoes left to fall for real-money DFS sites as they try to secure sponsorship deals with leagues for increased marketing opportunities. Clearly, if FanDuel or DraftKings got a deal done with the NFL, it would be a major coup for one of them.

Here is where the other major North American leagues and commissioners stand on the issue:

The reported one-year-deal mandate by the NFL is far from a clear indication that it is ready to move forward on DFS. But it is the first official action we have seen out of the league in the DFS space, and everyone in the industry will be waiting to see what it will do next.

Dustin Gouker Avatar
Written by
Dustin Gouker

Dustin Gouker has been a sports journalist for more than 15 years, working as a reporter, editor and designer -- including stops at The Washington Post and the D.C. Examiner.

View all posts by Dustin Gouker
Privacy Policy