- Sports Betting
- NJ Sports Betting
- PA Sports Betting
- US Betting
- LSR Podcast
Illinois is going to consider a sports betting bill unlike any other in the country.
Legal Sports Report obtained a copy of the amendment Rep. Mike Zalewski is proposing in the House, and it’s a doozy.
Zalewski’s attempt to legalize IL sports betting began with five impractical amendments, none of which garnered support. The expectation was that the rough edges would be softened, the fees worked out with stakeholders, and the best parts of each selected to form a workable bill.
Instead, the proposed fees increased, and the parameters for who can participate — and how they can do so — became much more complicated in this final proposal.
A previous amendment from the semifinal round would have excluded both from the market for three years. In response, DraftKings and FanDuel threatened a legal challenge and launched a public ad campaign against proponents of the penalty box.
Now, Zalewski is attempting to negate the issue by putting the entire internet in the box.
Under his new amendment, no operator could offer sports betting online or through a mobile application for 540 days after the effective date.
One positive about the language is that it’s very inclusive of all gaming stakeholders in the state — if they are willing to pay for the privilege.
The amendment would authorize sports betting via:
Incidentally, a licensed sports facility would only be allowed to conduct sports wagering within a five-block radius of the facility. All licenses would be valid for five years and renewable for $1 million thereafter.
The first batch of amendments in Illinois included a league amendment with a 0.25% royalty on handle.
The second set of amendments would have lowered the royalty to 0.2% but required the use of official league data for in-play wagers.
This final amendment does not include an integrity fee, and it adds a 540-day delay before licensees must use official data for in-play wagers.
Here are some other key elements within the 89-page amendment: