- Sports Betting
- NJ Sports Betting
- PA Sports Betting
- Indiana Sports Betting
- US Betting
- LSR Podcast
Mobile wagering in Indiana sports betting ran into one opponent in a high place.
“I think having it available everywhere within the four walls of the state is a problem, and I think consumer protections are a problem,” Smaltz said. “I don’t know why we wouldn’t have all casino games allowed to be played on a device if we are going to allow sports wagering on that device.”
Even though many stakeholders at the committee hearing held a week before the vote made the argument that mobile wagering was needed for the regulated market to capture the current black market, Smaltz didn’t see the connection.
Smaltz claimed that a black market also would have other advantages that would keep people from moving to a regulated market, such as betting on credit or not having the same age requirements or background checks.
“Someone could start an account on a mobile device and then sell it to anyone. If I have a cloned phone account set up to the game, it can circumvent age requirements. I think there are many problems with mobile gaming that should not be summarily dismissed.”
Finally, he questioned the size of the black market.
“Just the definition of a black market means that there isn’t any real data showing its size,” Smaltz said. “How do you know? We don’t know if it’s a big problem or a little problem. Trying to solve it by creating mobile sports wagering seems dubious to me.”
The committee did improve the sports betting portion of the bill by removing a requirement to use official league data for in-game wagering, which was a hotly contested point at the hearing between stakeholders and league representatives.
“We don’t normally require single sourcing for any good service information,” Smaltz said. “If you can only get it from one source, how do you responsibly charge for that? It seems like that’s unreasonable and nobody is doing it.”
In addition to sports betting, the bill passed by the Senate includes the movement off the water of two riverboat casinos in Gary and moves up the time frame for racinos to get table games.
The committee made significant changes in those areas:
Smaltz defended the $100 million fee.
“That’s the value of it,” Smaltz said of the move. “The current location isn’t nice. The owners will tell you that. The permits they have now paid for that specific location. Where they want to move, we can see a value increase of casino operations anywhere between $300 and $700 million.”
The bill is currently in the Ways and Means Committee, from where it needs to advance to the House floor by April 9.
“Prior to us amending the bill, I don’t think it would have passed committee,” Smaltz said. “After amending, it had a unanimous vote. That bodes well for it.”
Sources close to the process told LSR that there will be an effort to put mobile sports wagering back into the bill. Smaltz warned that he will continue to fight against such an effort.
“I’ll certainly keep talking about it,” Smaltz said. “There’s people who want to be on the other side. It will be an active issue.”