- Sports Betting
- NJ Sports Betting
- PA Sports Betting
- Indiana Sports Betting
- US Betting
- LSR Podcast
The House will try to push it forward in the final days of the legislative session.
Zalewski, who chairs the Revenue and Finance Committee, said the amendment will include the lottery, mandate the use of official league data for in-play wagers, and lower the fees and taxes from the last two amendments.
“That remains the No. 1 issue to be decided upon and then I think we can file a final amendment,” Zalewski said.
Paul Gaynor, representing Rivers Casino, has been particularly outspoken in hearings supporting a bad-actor clause to lock out DraftKings Sportsbook and FanDuel Sportsbook for up to three years.
The issue in question involves DraftKings and FanDuel offering daily fantasy sports in the state after a nonbinding 2015 opinion by the state attorney general suggested DFS violated state law.
Gaynor said DraftKings and FanDuel have captured more than 80 percent of the sports wagering market in NJ sports betting. He warned that Illinois stakeholders are not going to pay $10+ million for licenses to share less than 20 percent of the market.
Lawyers representing FanDuel responded that there would be a swift constitutional legal challenge for any attempt at a regulatory delay.
“This issue consumes all the oxygen related to sports betting right now,” Zalewski said. “We know we need to make a decision on whether to include a penalty box or not. We still haven’t reached a consensus way to move forward on this.”
Zalewski laughed when asked if he received feedback from stakeholders on the two amendment options he proposed for H 1260. He got a lot of input about the proposals, which included unprecedented taxes and fees.
He listened to those concerns and adjusted the fees and taxes downward. Yet don’t expect the initial license fee to go under the $10 million needed to meet Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s budget proposal.
“Tennessee going on official league data is indicative to us that we might not be the first state,” Zalewski said. “We could maybe survive that challenge.”
One of the previous amendments allowed the lottery to offer parlay wagering at 2,500 retail locations, while the other excluded lottery.
At the last hearing, Tom Swoik of the Illinois Casino Gaming Association lamented paying $10 million for a license when legal sports betting was available at so many locations.
“We think there’s room for a lottery pilot program,” Zalewski said. “It’s a state asset so we think it’s important to see what they can do with sports betting.”
Zalewski indicated that the lottery’s participation hasn’t been a concern for the other stakeholders. The focus has been on the details of that participation, meaning there could be a compromise on the number of lottery retailers offering sports betting.
“We’ve heard feedback on the type of wagers lottery concessionaires could take, the number of locations, where the money would go,” Zalewski said. “I think we solved those items.”
The legislative session comes to an end in Illinois at the conclusion of this month.
With the House bill yet to have advanced through a committee and nary a peep heard on sports betting from the Senate side, it seems highly unlikely that a sports betting bill can go the distance in the next 10 days.
However, Zalewski believes there is still hope this session. He plans to advance H 1260 through committee to the floor soon after the amendment is introduced.
Hope that the House and Senate could move quickly to pass the bill goes back to the Pritzker’s request for sports betting revenue in the budget, and the Democrat-led chambers wanting to come through for their new Democratic governor.
“We’ve been working with the Senate,” Zalewski said. “They know where we stand. This isn’t happening in a vacuum. I think there’s a desire to do sports betting in the governor’s office and two chambers.”