- Sports Betting
- NJ Sports Betting
- PA Sports Betting
- US Betting
- LSR Podcast
The potential for widespread sports betting is raising a lot of questions for US states that are considering legislation. Should they legalize it at all? What’s the proper tax rate? Who can offer sports betting?
But a new issue has cropped up in statehouses around the country, and will likely appear in Congress: “Integrity fees.”
What are integrity fees, and how can they impact the sports betting landscape in the US?
Integrity fees, as they’ve been advanced in some states, are basically taxes on legal sports betting.
They’ve been popularized by the NBA and Major League Baseball as they look to find a way to profit from the proliferation of sports betting in the US. The fee would transfer money from sportsbooks to sports governing bodies themselves.
Leagues first proposed the fees in Indiana in 2018. Then the NBA adopted them as its preferred policy around the country during a hearing in New York. NBA and MLB are actively opposing legislation that does not include an integrity fee.
It’s not an entirely new idea. For instance, pro leagues in both France and Australia already get a small percentage of wagers made in those jurisdictions. Curiously, they may have been introduced in the US by New Jersey lawmakers as a way to smooth the legal confrontation.
Whether integrity fees are implemented in one more more states remains to be seen, but time is running out for the leagues to make their case.
On May 14, 2018, the US Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Murphy vs. NCAA, the so-called “New Jersey sports betting case.” The US sports leagues had successfully blocked NJ’s efforts across multiple District and Circuit battles, culminating with an unlikely appellate hearing before the nation’s highest court.
SCOTUS presented the first judicial ruling against plaintiffs, striking down the federal ban as unconstitutional. To put it in black and white, the states won and the leagues lost.
Much to the chagrin of those leagues, states are now free to regulate sports betting at their discretion. They’ve been preparing for this day with heavy lobbying efforts, but the rug is sliding out from beneath them. None of the states that have passed sports betting laws have included integrity fees payable to sports entities. And more states will be moving on the matter soon.
All hope may not be lost in the quest, though. One thing all leagues agree on is a preference for superseding federal legislation that would create a unified set of rules. Immediately following the SCOTUS decision, Sen. Orrin Hatch announced intentions to do just that.
You can bet your bankroll that league lobbyists are already working the angles with Hatch and his colleagues.
An integrity fee, as proposed, would tax handle at a rate of one percent, payable to each league on which sports wagering would occur.
Some people who are new to the sports betting industry confuse handle for revenue. Handle is the total amount wagered by bettors, so it’s a gauge of how much money is flowing through sportsbooks. Revenue, on the other hand, is how much sportsbooks hold from the total amount wagered. Historically, this number comes in at about five percent of handle for sportsbook operators.
A integrity fee of one percent, then, would send that amount of wagers from the sportsbooks to the leagues, regardless of the revenue picture of the sportsbook. Using a baseline of five percent hold, a one percent integrity fee would equate to roughly 20 percent of revenue going to the leagues.
The fees, at least as written in the legislation we’ve seen so far, have no strings attached to them. It’s just a transfer of money from gaming operators to the leagues.
A lot. On a single state basis — especially small states — the money the NBA, MLB and other leagues might not profit from sports betting integrity fees.
Using a possible mature sports betting market of around $200 billion, that means about $2 billion in integrity fees would be paid out. That translate to hundreds of millions going to individual leagues like the NFL, NHL and the NCAA, possibly.
Of course, there’s already been some resistance to the idea of integrity fees in several states, so it’s not at all clear if this will get ported to a large number of states.
There are several reasons to be skeptical of integrity fees:
There are certainly costs for leagues that are associated with a proliferation of sports wagering. They’ll have to increase the amount of time and money that they spend on data monitoring and integrity protocols.
Of course, a regulated market gives them insight into sports betting markets that they do not have access to now. Namely, we’re talking about the black market — offshore sportsbooks worth tens of billions of dollars in handle annually.
Anyway, integrity is a concern for everyone — leagues, players, sportsbooks and governments. It deserves attention and money devoted to it. An integrity fee could help integrity, if implemented correctly.