The California legislature adjourns in two weeks, and there has been no sign of the daily fantasy sports bill in the Senate.
There are a lot of issues surrounding daily fantasy sports in California that seem to be keeping regulatory legislation on the sidelines.
A California Senate committee is set to take up daily fantasy sports regulation this week, five months after the Assembly passed a bill.
California and Florida are among the states where legal opinions from attorneys general on daily fantasy sports are conspicuous in their absence.
The legality of daily fantasy sports in California could be impacted if the state's attorney general, Kamala Harris, gets the Supreme Court nomination.
Two tribes in California -- the San Manuel and Morongo bands of Mission Indians -- have voiced opposition to a regulatory effort for daily fantasy...
As the topic of regulating daily fantasy sports heats up in California, the state's gambling interests - most notably tribes - are starting to weigh...
Virginia's Senate passed a daily fantasy sports bill on Monday -- the third state where legislation has gotten a positive vote in front of a...
California has emerged as one of the “hot spots” for daily fantasy sports, and could become the first state to pass a bill regulating daily fantasy sports.
Like most states in the U.S., DFS operators have taken customers in the state throughout the industry’s short history (since the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act was passed in 2006 with a carveout for fantasy sports).
Since then, there has been a lot of chatter, and action. Here’s a brief timeline of what has happened in the state:
The regulatory measure in California is AB 1437 — full text and bill tracking here. It is called the “Internet Fantasy Sports Games Consumer Protection Act.”
The bill sets up a regulatory framework overseeing DFS. Here is a look at some of the provisions of the bill:
Pretty much anyone who wants to run a DFS site in California is eligible to do so. That would mean that all existing gaming interests in the state — tribal casinos, tracks and cardrooms — could offer DFS or partner with an existing operator.
Operators must pay the licensing fee — which is to be determined. The Department of Justice will be charged with creating regulations about who is suitable for licensure.
The bill is currently on the full Assembly floor, after passing a pair of committee votes.
The bill must pass by a two-thirds majority, because it is a revenue bill.
If and when it passes the Assembly, it will move to committee in the state Senate.