With less than three weeks off the calendar in 2015, three states have active bills addressing fantasy sports.
All major daily fantasy sites currently block players from Washington State.
The legislation is modest, at least in terms of length. The two-page bill has two components:
Despite the brevity, there’s a potential point of conflict in the bill. The first component specifically identifies “fantasy sports contests” as the activity the legislature intends to define as a contest of skill – and no other types of fantasy games.
But as noted above, the definition of “fantasy competitions” borrows from the UIGEA, whose scope covers not only sports, but also any “educational game or contest that involves a fantasy team” – a much broader purview that could include a wider array of markets (politics, stocks, celebrities, etc).
Utilizing the UIGEA language makes sense on one level – it adds some heft to the bill and promotes a legislative consistency.
But at the same time, there’s a risk to the strategy. The UIGEA effectively pre-dates daily fantasy sports, making it difficult to argue that the fantasy exemption was written with DFS in mind. And, should that aspect of the UIGEA ever face a challenge (admittedly a massive if), we might see a weakness opened for Washington’s law as well.
The Senate version is co-sponsored by Senators Roach, Fain, Hatfield, and Mullet. Representatives Pettigrew, Vick, Buys, Stokesbary, Van De Wege, Reykdal, McCaslin, and Magendanz make up the sponsors on the House side.
The House bill now moves to the House Commerce and Gaming Committee. Representative Vick is the only one among the sponsors who also sits on the GCG.
Coincidentally, a bill to regulate online poker was filed in Washington State just days before the introduction of the fantasy sports measure.